- in Accelerating the Transition, agriculture, climate, Climate change, climate progress, Collaboration, Covid 19, Economics, Electricity Users, Energy, Energy storage, EVs, LNG, LNG Transition, Low Carbon Future, Low Carbon Future, microgrids, Nuclear, Redefining the mental model, Regenerative Capitalism, Regenerative Economics, Regenerative System Elements, Renewable Based Thermal Energy, Renewable Energy, Solar, Sustainability, Toxic emissions, Transition to lower carbon, Transportation, Uncategorized, Wind
- Leave a comment
How much would it cost to power the entire U-S-with solar panels and battery storage?
One of the flaws in the “renewable energy” narrative is that it only addresses electricity consumption, and electricity is only 19% of the energy the U.S. uses.
I don’t know anyone more interested in eliminating “combustion” from our energy mix than I am.
But, I’ve also been scorched by “renewable energy” evangelists for pointing out that if we used the same thermal energy storage that the CSP does, but heated it with the enormous electricity capability we’re not able to use as electricity, we could take out that industrial combustion use fed by gas, and oil.
Here’s another example of what happens with solar generation, when it’s added to the essential “reliability” generation our economy requires.
If you were to add up the wind generation electricity, and this over generated solar electricity and used it to replace the industrial heat in the first chart, we’d see both pollutions and carbon emissions go down a lot.
If we used EV’s to store the extra electricity, rather than the utility-scale batteries, we’d see a massive drop in urban pollution from transportation fuels.
If we do that aggressively, we will be able to use a lot more solar, a lot more wind, the pollution could get closer to today’s covid 19 level pollution, and the oil price would stay so low that the petroleum industry would wither and die.
But there is hope for the fossil fuel industry because, rather than the dirty petroleum products, we’ll still need natural gas.
And we need to use clean natural gas for both industry, heat and making flexible electricity.
A truth that is “inconvenient” is that about is that natural gas is being burned anyway, to avoid methane pollution that’s 26 times worse than CO2.
If we make electricity with it, to replace dirty oil engines, we end up with the greenest of all options.
My point is that we must get over the notion of trying to power an entire economy from one or two sources of energy.
With the combination of Solar, Wind, Geothermal, Hydroelectric, Pumped Hydroelectric Storage, Battery Storage, Thermal Energy Storage, Natural gas, LNG storage, and Nuclear, we can power the whole global economy, with pollution-free electricity plus support the fourth industrial revolution without burning any dirty fuels.
- Exploring the Link Between Pollution and COVID-19 Mortality | Department of Biostatistics | Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health
- If you’re serious about stopping “climate change”please read this: All of it.
- The question “Can Technology alone define the future of renewables?” is indicative of how much value is hiding unnoticed.
- An Agenda for Genuine Financial Reform – CAPITAL INSTITUTE
- A Blueprint for Rural Electrification: Building a Market for Mini-Grids in Niger | by Power Africa | Aug, 2020 | Medium
- March 2021
- February 2021
- January 2021
- August 2020
- July 2020
- June 2020
- May 2020
- April 2020
- March 2020
- February 2020
- January 2020
- December 2019
- November 2019
- October 2019
- September 2019
- August 2019
- July 2019
- June 2019
- May 2019
- April 2019
- March 2019
- February 2019
- January 2019
- December 2018
- November 2018
- September 2018
- August 2018
- July 2018
- June 2018
- May 2018
- April 2018
- April 2015
- September 2012
- January 2012